Upcoming CLE: U.S. Supreme Court Review 2024.

Mitchell Hamline School of Law is hosting its annual U.S. Supreme Court Review, Tuesday, October 22, 2024, from 5:00 to 6:30 PM, with a reception to follow. This program will be held in person in the Mitchell Hamline auditorium and is hosted by Professor Mike Steenson and Professor Mehmet Konar-Steenberg. With this year's SCOTUS activity, this should be an interesting and very thought-provoking discussion. The program is pending for 1.5 CLE credits.

Register here.

- - -

Some other upcoming Mitchell Hamline CLEs:

Mastering Standardized Field Sobriety Tests: A Legal And Practicable Perspective (virtual). Thursday, September 26, 2024, 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM.

Ramsey County Bar Association "Does Democracy Matter?" Tuesday, October 1, 2024, 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM, in the Mitchell Hamline auditorium. Registration required by September 27, 2024.

The Federal Estate Tax Exemptions Will Be Changing.

Federal estate tax code allows for an exemption for estate taxes due after a person's death. This exemption has been increasing annually over the past several years, and is currently $13.61 million for an individual and $27.22 million for a married couple. This exemption is the amount the federal government allows each person to pass to non-charitable and non-spouse heirs before any federal estate tax is owed.

Beginning on January 1, 2026, the federal exemption for estate taxes will be reduced. This change is not due to recent law changes, as it was built into current law. The law included a sunset provision that would roll back the exemption after the end of 2025. After the law's sunset, we can expect these exemptions to be cut in half in 2026, to approximately $7 million for an individual's estate and $14 million for the estate of a married couple. It is possible that Congress could act on this before 2026, but it appears unlikely, and one should not count on that.

Note that Minnesota's estate tax exemption stands at $3 million for an individual and $6 million for a married couple. At this time, there is no Minnesota tax law provision changing those exemption amounts.

While exact numbers for the 2025 exemption have yet to be announced (it's based on inflation), it is estimated that next year's estate tax exemption will be approximately $14 million per person. What this means is that if your estate is valued at greater than $7 million or $14 million for a couple, you may need to make some plans before the end of 2025.

There are a number of ways you can shelter some of your estate assets while you are still alive. For example, you can set up trusts, give to charities, or give gifts to people. It should be noted that there are no plans at this time for the federal government to reduce the annual gift tax exclusion, which is $18,000 per person gifted per year.

The impact of these changes can be complicated, and can vary based on many factors. The sunset deadline is approaching and will be here before you know it. It would be wise to seek the advice of a qualified estate planning attorney and a qualified financial planner.

Simultaneous Deaths Of Both Spouses.

The chance that two spouses would die at the same time is very slim. Nevertheless, it is a non-zero risk and, painful as it may be to think about it, such a tragic situation should be considered when making your estate plans.

Under the common law, if two spouses died close to the same time, it had to be determined by medical evidence which person actually died first, even if the deaths were only a few moments apart. The estate of the spouse that died first would pass to the second spouse, and then the second spouse's estate (which is combined with the first spouse's estate) would pass to the second spouse's heirs. This scenario required two probates!

However, it is often impractical or even impossible to determine the order of two deaths with any certainty.

Enter the revised Uniform Simultaneous Death Act, which Minnesota incorporated into its Probate Code in the 1990s. Under this Act, if two spouses die within 120 hours of one another, and there is no Will, the law treats each spouse as having predeceased the other. Therefore, the law views it as a simultaneous death, even if the two spouses died up to 120 hours apart. Then, the probate court applies the laws of intestacy to determine which beneficiaries will share in the two spouses' combined estate.

Having a poorly-drafted Will isn't always helpful, and in fact can complicate things. If each spouse's Will names the other spouse as sole beneficiary, without clearly naming contingent beneficiaries, problems can arise. The Will does not give instructions as to how the combined estate is divided by the couple's descendants, and the probate court must apply the laws of intestacy to distribute estate assets.

Here's where things can get even more complicated.

Suppose the couple have a blended family, i.e., each spouse has children from previous relationships. Each spouse has a Will, favoring their respective children. Perhaps these Wills were executed by each spouse before they were married, and they never executed new Wills after they were married. If both spouses are deemed to have died simultaneously under the law, whose children receive shares of the estate? The outcome is uncertain.

For example:

Adam and Betty get married. Adam has a son from a previous relationship, and Betty has two daughters. Adam and Betty each have Wills executed before they got married, and they never got around to getting new Wills.

Then, a terrible tragedy strikes. Betty dies right away, but Adam lives 3 more days. Under the law, the probate court treats Adam as having died before Betty, and Betty as having died before Adam. Simultaneous deaths.

Whose children receive shares of Adam and Betty's combined estate? Again, an uncertain outcome. There may also be uncertainty for any gifts to individuals outside the family, charitable donations, etc., if the two spouses' Wills differ on those issues.

To prevent that, Adam and Betty could have had Wills drafted that names one of them to have survived the other, and the Will of the presumed "surviving" spouse would govern as to contingent beneficiaries. There may be some tax benefit in doing this, as well.

* * *

If you do not have an estate plan, or your existing plan is dated or you're just not sure, it would be wise to seek a qualified Minnesota estate planning attorney.

Why Do People Put Off Getting An Estate Plan?

I hear many reasons--excuses, really--why people are hesitant to having an estate plan drafted. Here are a few common objections:

 

"I don't need one now, I'm too young."

A well-crafted estate plan is not just for older people. Unfortunately, people can die at any time. It would be wise to have a valid estate plan in place, regardless of your age. 

"I'll deal with it later."

Sure, life's hectic, with careers and family responsibilities. However, it doesn't take a lot of time to have a qualified practitioner craft an estate plan that helps ensure your assets go to those you want to receive them.

"I don't have enough assets for an estate plan to matter."

Even small estates can and should be protected. Sentimental or family heirlooms are important, even if their monetary value isn't great. Even if you don't own real estate or have large monetary assets, you still should consider protecting the assets you do have and make sure your loved ones would receive them if something happened to you.

Keep in mind that many disagreements happen over modest estates.

 

"My kids will just sort things out when I'm gone."

If you don't have a valid will, Minnesota intestacy law decides where your assets go after you die. The law generally follows "next of kin," but that may not be what you want. Maybe you wish to give assets to children unequally, or perhaps leave out one who is estranged or has addiction issues. Intestacy doesn't factor that in. Want to leave something to a close friend? Sorry, that cannot be done without a valid estate plan. Would you like to donate to a charity? Without a valid estate plan that won't happen.

Another issue to consider is who will be responsible for administering your estate when you're gone. Without an estate plan to nominate a person or persons to be the Personal Representative of your estate, it may be up to the probate court to make that decision. The person they appoint may not be one you would choose--perhaps even a total stranger.

 

"It costs too much." 

A basic will is a very powerful instrument and can be very affordable, especially when you consider the time and expense your loved ones would endure if they have to sort through your assets, deal with the probate court, etc. (See intestacy, above)

"I'm not comfortable talking about death-related issues."

It's never easy. Talking about your death can be unnerving. Wouldn't you rather solve this issue now and not have to worry about it later? Having an estate plan in place can bring peace of mind.

* * *

Protecting your hard-earned assets means having confidence in knowing that those you care about will receive them. There's no time like the present. Contact a qualified Minnesota estate planning attorney to find out how to get your estate plan started.

 

 

"If I Die Without A Will, Is My Ex-Spouse Entitled To Any Of My Estate Assets?"

The short answer: No.

If you die intestate (leaving no valid Will), Minnesota's intestacy laws exclude ex-spouses. Therefore, an ex-spouse is not entitled to your estate assets. Instead, your assets would be distributed based on the state's intestate succession law: to current spouse, children, parents, siblings, etc. Next of kin.

However, if your divorce decree requires division of marital property and you still have any of that property when you die, your ex would have legal claim based on the decree.

For example: if the decree requires dividing proceeds from selling the house, but you die before the sale is completed, your ex-spouse is entitled to the share of the property, per the terms of the divorce decree. Thus, your ex could make a claim against your estate in probate court. 

As you can see, these types of scenarios are governed by the terms in the divorce decree.

Another issue would arise if your divorce is not final at the time of your death. You would still be legally married at that time, and your spouse would be entitled to at least a spousal elective share under Minnesota law. And if you have no valid Will, guess what? The intestacy laws put your spouse at the head of the line for inheriting your estate assets.

If you are divorced and you haven't already done so, it is a good idea to review your financial instruments that have named beneficiaries, such as insurance policies, retirement plans, investments, and assets with payable-on-death provisions such as bank accounts and real estate. Your ex-spouse may still be named as a beneficiary and you may wish to change that. Fortunately, Minnesota law automatically revokes the beneficiary designation of an ex-spouse, so revisiting those instruments is mainly a matter of naming new beneficiaries.

Finally, if you have Power of Attorney or a Health Care Directive that names your ex-spouse as a fiduciary, you may wish to review those documents. Minnesota law also automatically revokes the fiduciary status of an ex-spouse, so revisiting those allows you to choose new fiduciaries.

* * *

If you are recently divorced or are currently in the divorce process, it would be a good idea to seek out a qualified attorney to discuss your estate planning needs. Your divorce attorney should have some knowledge of how your estate could be impacted by divorce, and they may be able to help with some of those concerns. However, it would be wise to seek separate estate planning counsel to ensure all of your estate-related issues are addressed and up-to-date.

Practitioners' Corner: A Few Upcoming CLEs from Mitchell Hamline.

There are two upcoming continuing legal education seminars worth checking out, both of them live, online. These are free for William Mitchell and Mitchell Hamline alumni and students.

Oppressive Trauma Informed Care and Healing Practices for Law Students and Lawyers, Thursday, January 18, 2024, from 7:00 to 8:00 PM, on Zoom. This live virtual CLE has 1.0 Elimination of Bias credit pending.

In Case You Missed it -- Food Law Center Symposium, Thursday, January 25, 2024, from 9:00 AM to 12:20 PM, co-hosted by the Health Law Institute, on Zoom. This live virtual CLE has 3.25 standard CLE credits pending.

Things To Consider When Choosing A Personal Representative.

When putting together your Will there are many "moving parts" to think about. Your assets, who you want to receive them, who gets what, and so forth. But who do you want to manage your estate after you pass? Oftentimes, the thought behind naming a Personal Representative (aka, "executor") is given short shrift. "Oh, I'll just have my daughter or son do that" is a common response I hear when I ask a client about the subject.

The choice of your estate's Personal Representative is something that should be given much serious thought. After all, that individual will be responsible for distributing your valuable assets after you pass. 

The job of Personal Representative is three-fold: 

1. Collect and protect estate assets, 
2. pay valid debts of the estate, and 
3. distribute any remainder to the beneficiaries named in the Will. 

Keep in mind that your choice of Personal Representative is that of nominee. Legally, they do not become the official Personal Representative until the probate court appoints them as such. A person who is at least 18 years of age and is someone the probate court has not disqualified may serve as a Personal Representative.

Serving as a Personal Representative is not a job to be taken lightly. Nor should you take lightly the choice of who to entrust with that responsibility. 

Some factors to think about when mulling over your possible choices for a Personal Representative:

• Is the person trustworthy? The Personal Representative is a fiduciary and they have a duty to always act in the best interests of your estate. Are you confident that they will do the right thing? Does the person have money or substance abuse issues that might be of concern?  

• Do you see any potential conflicts of interest? Minnesota law does not prevent a beneficiary from also serving as a Personal Representative. Nevertheless, will your Personal Representative be able to look past their personal interests and needs and focus on what's best for the estate? 

• Does the person have good interpersonal skills? Do they have the mettle to work with sometimes difficult people, such as creditors, debtors, bureaucrats, and impatient family members?
  

• Does the person possess good organizational skills and pay attention to detail? Can that person be able to keep track of assets, bills, accounts, and other day-to-day needs of the estate?
  

• Have you considered the practicalities facing the person serving? Do they live far away, have busy careers, family obligations, etc., that might create a hardship for them? Serving as Personal Representative takes a lot of time and diligence, even with "modest" estates.
  

• Will grief cloud their vision or their ability to do the job? Will it be too much for them to handle?
  

• Do you know one or two trustworthy persons (who also meet the above criteria) who could serve as alternates in the event your first choice cannot or will not serve?

Before choosing someone to serve it is always best to talk with that person first. Tell them what the job entails and what is expected of them--be candid. Give them time to think it over and let them discuss it with their family members. Don't be offended if the person declines serving--it's for the best if they don't have their heart in it.

When Should I Update My Will?

No matter how carefully your Will is crafted, it's impossible to predict future life events. Life events that could give cause for the need to revisit, and amend or re-draft your Will. 

Here is an outline of some events and life changes that may require having a qualified attorney review your existing Will with you.

• Change in marital status. Marriage, divorce, or having a domestic partner who would not be entitled to receive a share of your estate under laws of intestacy.
• New children/grandchildren, either by birth or through adoption.
• A child who has reached the legal age of majority, and no longer needs to have a custodian under UTMA.
• Moving to a new state.
• Death or change of relationship with a beneficiary. Perhaps one has become estranged, or has developed issues with substance abuse, gambling, etc.
• Death or change with one or more fiduciaries. A nominated Personal Representative may no longer be able or willing to serve, or is no longer someone you wish to have in such a capacity.
• Changes in status of guardians/conservators. Are these persons still appropriate for those roles?
• Changes in real property ownership. You bought a new home or vacation property, or sold the like.
• Changes in financial situation. Increase/decrease in earnings, retirement, public assistance, new health expenses, etc.
• Changes in asset valuation. Large estate assets, like real property, investments, valuables, can fluctuate, affecting how you may wish to distribute them after you die.
• Opening/closing a business venture.
• Changes in tax laws.
• Changes in state laws that may impact your estate planning wishes.
• More than 5 years have passed since your present Will was signed.
• Changes of heart/mind. You may simply wish to distribute your assets in ways that differ from your intentions when your existing Will was signed.

This list is by no means complete, and there may be other factors that could trigger the need to revisit your estate plan. If any such life event arises, or if you are just in doubt, it may be a good idea to review your Will with a qualified estate planning attorney.

Do I Need A New Will If I Move To Another State?

A Will that is properly executed in one state is generally valid in another state. This is based on the Full Faith and Credit clause of the U.S. Constitution. 

That said, there are state-specific rules for the drafting and execution of Wills, and the probate process, that can vary from state to state. While all 50 states have adopted the Uniform Probate Code, each state has the discretion to tweak the Code language as it sees fit. These variations may impact certain provisions in your Will, and affect how the probate process may apply to your Will.

Different states may require different elements for a Will to be valid. Many states require that the Will be typed or printed. Other states allow hand-written Wills ("holographic" Wills). There may be variations as to notarizing a Will, and who must witness the signing.

Estate and inheritance taxes may differ from state to state.

Property laws can vary from state to state, and some provisions in a Will executed in one state may not be valid in some other states. In the majority of states, common law applies, wherein a spouse that acquires property solely and completely owns that property. However, nine states apply community property law. In this case, all property acquired by either spouse is owned jointly by both spouses. If you have a Will executed in a common law state and you move to a community property state (or vice versa), there are issues that may arise after you die.

Moving is exciting, but it can be stressful and filled with lots of tasks. When relocating to a new state, don't take chances with your estate plan. Seek a qualified estate planning attorney in your new state and have them review your existing Will. In addition, it would also be prudent for you to have the new attorney look over your Health Care Directive and Power of Attorney.

Minnesota Attorneys: Mitchell Hamline Offers a Trove of Free, On-Demand CLEs for Alumni.

Under Rule 2R, the Minnesota State Board of Continuing Legal Education now allows an attorney to claim up to 30 hours of on-demand video CLEs as part of their 45 hour requirement each reporting period. This is a doubling of the pre-2021 limit for on-demand.

Mitchell Hamline has made available (at the time of this posting) over two dozen on-demand CLE programs that are offered free to alumni. Most of these CLEs are in the 1.0-1.5 credit range, and most are approved for standard CLE credit. However, there are a few offerings approved for ethics and elimination of bias credit. The topics covered are very diverse and there's something for everyone.

Did I mention that these are free?

Under the rules, video CLEs are available for on-demand credit for two years after approval. Therefore, each of the offerings will eventually sunset and be removed. Check MHSLs site from time-to-time, as no doubt they will be posting new CLEs as they become available.

There are also links to several free, on-demand CLEs hosted by the Health Law Institute of Mitchell Hamline (scroll down to the bottom of the page).

It is therefore possible for a MHSL/WMCL alum to satisfy most, if not all, of their 30 hour allotment of on-demand CLE credit from this one source, for no cost. Since each of the CLEs are about an hour to 90 minutes long, these are ideal to watch during your lunch break, if you have some downtime somewhere, or are just at home and want to binge-watch a bunch of them.

Of course this means that the state rules still require at least 15 other credits come from live sources, either in-person or by live video. Check Mitchell Hamline's Campus Calendar for upcoming events.

With that in mind, I will mention that Mitchell Hamline is offering an upcoming live video CLE, Flow Practice for Attorneys: The Pathway to Peak Performance and Optimal Well-Being. This CLE will be conducted Tuesday, March 14, 2023, from noon to 1:00 PM CT. Approval for 1.0 standard credit is pending. Registration is free for alumni.